The “Wisconsin Idea,” often described as the most succinct explanation for the university’s role in the state of Wisconsin, will be dissected on campus during 15 lectures this fall in Sociology 496: “FORWARD? The Wisconsin Idea, Past and Present.”
The course, held Tuesday evenings, is aimed at undergraduates, says organizer Patrick Brenzel, a university staffer in the department of sociology, but last year’s sessions also attracted a wide audience from the community.
“I want to see the campus reminded of its legacy,” says Brenzel. “We need to talk about our roots. The University of Wisconsin is steeped in a history that is honorable.”
“Wisconsin Idea” can be defined in various ways, as it can be applied to the university or the state as a whole. In terms of the University, the most famous formulation came from UW President Charles Van Hise in 1904, who said he would “never be content until the beneficent influence of the university reaches every family in the state.
Recent political trends have caused the university to reexamine and reinforce the Wisconsin Idea, and none too soon, says Brenzel. “I think we have lost our engagement with state government. The University of Wisconsin used play a very honorable advisory role in forming laws and creating policy that made Wisconsin a better place to live.”
These ideas motivated Brenzel and Chad Goldberg, a professor of sociology, to initiate the class last fall. By design, a new instructor will teach each year, says Eric Sandgren, a professor at the School of Veterinary Medicine who is this fall’s instructor.
Sandgren says different people have different answers to the fundamental question of why the Wisconsin Idea might matter. “In general, it’s a really good idea to understand key aspects of the history of whatever institution you are part of, and in last couple of years, that’s become even more important.”
Another motivation emerges from the fragmented nature of the Madison campus, one of the largest and most academically diverse in the nation.
“We call ourselves a university, but if you look inside, we are organized into disciplines; making us more like a multi-versity,” Sandgren says. “Loyalty tends to be to the discipline and department, and less to the university as a whole.”
Focusing on the Wisconsin Idea, he says, is one answer to the question of “what can we do to bring ourselves together.”
Meeting “the exacting standard” of the Wisconsin Idea entails crossing boundaries, and Madison already benefits from a well-recognized cross-disciplinary culture, Sandgren says.
“We have an extraordinary breadth of disciplines, and our people are among the best of the best. Effective solutions to big problems almost always require multi-disciplinary responses, and this is certainly true in science, where we need to cross boundaries to discuss communication, morality, ethics, political science and sociology. You can’t just say, ‘Here are the facts.’ Creating effective solutions requires participation from all of these disciplines.”
These topics will be among the 15 covered this fall:
- The origins of the Wisconsin Idea in the context of a land-grant university;
- What tracking the lives of the Wisconsin high school class of 1957 has taught us about leading happy and healthy lives;
- How the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation serves as intermediary between university inventors and the world of business;
- Arts and the Wisconsin Idea; and
- Wisconsin Women’s studies and the history of progressive innovation.
Sociology 496 can be taken as lectures alone, or lectures plus discussion. Lectures will be Tuesdays at 7 p.m., discussion will be Tuesday at 2:30. See wiscidea.com for details.
David Tenenbaum